A division bench here comprising justices K K Sasidharan and B Gokuldas issued notice to the actor and also the Dindigul District Collector.
Directing the petitioner's counsel to send a private notice to the actor's residential address in Mumbai and apprise him of the details of the case, the court posted the matter to July 11 for further hearing.
Petitioner N Ganesan of Dindigul district submitted that the channel known as Rajavaikkal was the main source of irrigation in Ayyampauli and his village Balasamudram.
The actor also encroached on government land and planted coconut and guava saplings, the petitioner charged.
He further submitted that in his response to a query under Right to Information Act, the Deputy Tahsildar (Headquarters), Palani had confirmed the encroachment by the actor and assured necessary action against the encroacher. But no action had been taken so far, he added.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
