In a relief to candidates who were provisionally selected to the posts of lecturers in state-run polytechnics in Tamil Nadu, the Madras High Court Thursday directed the Teachers Recruitment Board (TRB) to proceed with the selection process.
The court also directed the board to reject the candidature of 196 aspirants who are accused of tampering answer sheets.
The issue of alleged tampering of answer-sheets brought whole selection process to a grinding halt.
A Division Bench, comprising justices K K Sasidharan and P D Audikesavalu, confirmed the order of a single judge at the high court's Madurai Bench and directed the TRB to complete the selection exercise by April 30.
The TRB had invited applications for 1,058 vacant posts of lecturers in various disciplines in polytechnics in the 2017-18 academic year. The written exam was held on September 16, 2017, for which 1.33 lakh candidates had appeared.
When the board was verifying certificates, after holding the written exam, complaints were made alleging malpractice in respect of scanned copies of the Optical Mark Reader/Recognition (OMR) sheets entrusted for evaluation to an external agency based in Noida.
The TRB immediately cancelled the entire selection process and the notification rescinding the selection was challenged before the Madurai Bench by a batch of petitioners who were provisionally selected.
The single judge at Madurai allowed the petitions, opining that after cancelling the candidature of the 196 tainted candidates, it would be possible for the board to proceed further.
Another single judge at the principal seat, however, dismissed a batch of writ petitions on the ground that the sanctity of the selection process should be maintained by all concerned.
When the appeals came up, the division bench said the core question before it was whether the TRB was correct in cancelling the whole selection process.
The police officer who probed the case submitted before it that more marks were awarded to 196 candidates by using the scanned images of OMR sheets, the bench said.
Originals of all the 1,33,568 OMR sheets, however, remained in the safe custody of the board.
The officer, an additional deputy commissioner of police, stated that the tampering was established after verifying the 196 scanned images seized from the external agency with corresponding original OMR sheets with the board.
Citing various Supreme Court judgments, the high court bench in its order said that "in the subject case, there is absolutely no difficulty to reject the candidature of the tainted candidates."
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
