The petitioner K S Radhakrishnan, DMK spokesperson, submitted that the factory is running smoothly and earning profits. However, the state government, "in a sudden move", is proposing to close and sell the factory and its properties, both movable and immovable.
Besides, the government did not act to update technologies in the factory. Hence, it was necessary to direct the government to update the technologies at the TANCEM and to stop the proposal to close or selling it to private firms, he submitted.
The division bench comprising justices S Tamilvanan and V S Ravi ordered issue of notice to the Chief Secretary, Industry Secretary and TANCEM Managing Director and adjourned the case.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
