HC orders probe after PIL alleges MHADA official-builder nexus

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Feb 08 2018 | 8:50 PM IST
The Bombay High Court today ordered a probe by Anti-Corruption Bureau into allegations that several developers failed to hand over a part of redeveloped properties to Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), causing loss to the exchequer.
A public interest litigation filed in the court claimed that builders often fail to hand over part of the redeveloped "cess buildings", which they are required to do according to the agreement with MHADA.
MHADA officials were complicit in this, it alleged.
Cess buildings are old, dilapidated buildings, whose maintenance is the responsibility of MHADA, a state body. Residents of the buildings pay a "cess" to the MHADA for this.
A bench of justices S C Dharmadhikari and Bharati Dangre also directed petitioner Kamlakar Shenoy to record his statement with the state ACB. MHADA should come up with a procedure to prevent such practices in the future, it said.
The government provides additional Floor Space Index (FSI) to developers as an incentive to redevelop dilapidated properties; in return the developers are required to return a few flats in the redeveloped building to MHADA.
Shenoy alleged that developers must surrender a part of the redeveloped property to MHADA before obtaining Occupation Certificate, but it often doesn't happens.
This is very common in redevelopment of cess buildings in the upscale south Mumbai area, he said.
This has caused a loss of about Rs 14,000 crore to MHADA due to "deliberate inaction" of its officials, he said.
MHADA told the court that cases of breach of agreement by developers occurred before 2011, not thereafter.
"We have already filed FIRs against private developers in the earliercases," the MHADA lawyer told the HC. It has also initiated civil proceedings in these cases, the lawyer added.
Shenoy, however, said while criminal cases were filed against developers, no action was even taken against the MHADA officials complicit in these frauds.
The court said the ACB should look into the entire case and take appropriate action.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 08 2018 | 8:50 PM IST

Next Story