The alleged assault on the woman lawyer by the police prompted the Delhi High Court Bar Association to call for a post-lunch strike today.
A bench of justices Siddharth Mridul and Deepa Sharma directed the Home Ministry and the Delhi government to "forthwith" take action in accordance with the law against the "delinquent officers" and file a report before the next hearing on January 5.
The court said it was "pained and disappointed" by the conduct of the police and added that if this was the practice followed in bailable offences, "then what would happen in non- bailable offences".
The court also questioned how the magisterial court twice cancelled the bail of the petitioner, Deepa Arya.
The DCP was also directed to keep in its custody all the relevant records pertaining to the FIR in question and the incident on December 18 evening, when the woman was dragged out of her house.
The bench also ordered the police to provide security to the woman till the next hearing.
The order was passed after the woman lawyer moved a contempt plea, seeking action against the errant officers for violating the high court's December 18 direction not to take any coercive action against her.
According to lawyers, including senior advocates Kirti Uppal and Vikas Pahwa, appearing for the woman, the molestation case was lodged against her in connection with a property dispute.
In the plea, filed through advocate Avadh Kaushik, the woman lawyer has claimed that the Safdarjung Enclave police broke open the main door of her house in Mayur Vihar-I and then dragged her out of her residence.
Her lawyers claimed that the high court's order yesterday protecting the woman from coercive action was passed before 4pm and was communicated to the investigating officer (IO) of the case.
The IO, who came to the court after the bench ordered his presence, defended his actions, saying he received late the communication that the non-bailable warrant against the woman had been stayed or set aside.
He said he received the information after 5pm, and by the time he had arrested her but as soon as he came to know about the stay order he released her.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
