The bench, headed by Justice K T Sankaran, was constrained to retire to the chamber as none of the lawyers in the 20-odd listed cases turned up in the morning session.
The lawyers complained that the weekly caus list of the particular court was not available on the official website of the high court so that they could not prepare in advance.
On the opening day of the court after summer vacation yesterday also, no advocate was present before the bench.
The same scenario repeated this morning. However, the advocates were present when the bench took up the cases in the afternoon.
While expressing its displeasure over the attitude of the lawyers, the bench pointed out that the absence of counsel for petitioners during the hearing of criminal appeals would adversely affect the appellants who are in jail.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
