HC quashes criminal proceedings agains ship captain

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jul 06 2018 | 8:50 PM IST

The Madras High Court has quashed criminal proceedings in a lower court pending against the captain of a ship allegedly for abetting the death of six crew members during cyclonic storm Nilam in 2012.

"The prosecution has not clearly established the proximitybetween his acts and the death of the vessel crew members and the act was due to the omissions on his part.

Hence, no useful purpose would be served in rendering a finding on the other aspects," Justice M S Ramesh said in a recent order.

The judge was allowing a criminal original petition filed under CrPC Sec. 482 CrPC (saving of inherent powers from high court) from Sunil Kumar Rai, captain of the Pratibha Cauvery ship, challenging the proceedings on June 26 last.

Pratibha Cauvery had come to the Chennai Port on September 28, 2012 from Kolkata.

Around noon on October 31, strong winds during Cyclone Nilam resulted in the ship running aground off Chennais coast. Six crew members drowned when they tried to escape.

Advocate B SathishSundar submitted thatthe overt acts attributed to the petitioner, iftaken on the face of it, cannot mean that he hadcommitted certain wilful acts or omissions which had probablycaused the death of crew members.

It was on account of thenatural calamity and not the wrong decision of the captain of theship, he argued.

Accepting the submissions, the judge said from the facts of the case, the captain ordered the crew to abandon ship during the storm.

"While the crew were in the life boat, it capsized due to heavy storm and rough sea conditions and the petitioner, who was the person ashore, is made liable for certain acts of alleged omissions," the judge said.

The documents produced before this court are to establish that the vessel was sailing under proper authority from Kolkata to Chennai and came to be stranded while awaiting further orders for repairs from the port authorities, the jduge said.

These documents obtained from the authorities concerned cannot be discarded or ignored.

"When such documents reveal that the petitioner herein did not have any overt act to mulct him with a charge this court would be well within its powers inlooking into such documents," the judge said.

"The language of CrPC sec 482 are explicitly clear to give powers to this court to look into such documents for the purpose of securing the ends of justice," the judge said and quashed the criminal proceedings before a Magistrate court here.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 06 2018 | 8:50 PM IST

Next Story