HC quashes govt order appointing Edwin Joe as DME

Image
Press Trust of India Madurai
Last Updated : Dec 12 2017 | 6:05 PM IST
The Madras High court today quashed a state government order appointing Edwin Joe as Director of Medical Education.
The court's Madurai bench directed the principal health secretary to consider his merit, seniority and ability and that of another contestant for the post S Revathy with an open mind and appoint one of them as DME as per law.
A division bench of the bench comprising Justices M Venugopal and Abdul Quddhose also set aside the order of the single judge appointing Revathy as DME.
The court said the government order (GO) has not weighed the pros and cons of the comparative merit, ability of the medical officers coupled with seniority.
Revathy's claim that she is senior to Joe was not reflected in qualitative and quantitive terms in the government order, it said.
Joe's contention that administrative experience in the post of dean was not relevant to the post of DME was contrary to service rules, it said.
"Besides certain insertions made in black ink (in G O appointing Joe as DME) do not inspire the confidence of the court."
"Hence the court based on equity, fair play, justice and good conscience and even as a matter of prudence sets aside the G.O (government order)," it said.
The court directed the health secretary to reconsider the case of Revathy and Edwin Joe afresh for promotion to the post of DME in a free and fair manner within six weeks from the receipt of the order.
Setting aside the single judge order, the court said "The single judge's positive direction to the government to grant promotion to Revathy as DME with all the consequential benefits are held to be incorrect in the eye of law. Accordingly it is set aside."
The court earlier ordered status quo on the single judge order.
Revathy had filed a case claiming that she had the seniority to become the DME.
In September this year, Justice R.Mahadevan had directed authorities to appoint her as DME.
The government and Edwin Joe appealed against the single judge's order.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 12 2017 | 6:05 PM IST

Next Story