HC questions competence of poll panel over bogus voters issue

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 13 2015 | 5:31 PM IST
Delhi High Court today questioned the competence of the Election Commission of India (ECI) and Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) after they failed to point out why errors like same photos appearing for different persons were being found in the voters' list for the upcoming assembly polls in the capital.
"We are not saying you are doing it (errors) deliberately. We are only questioning your competence," Justice Vibhu Bakhru said and observed if there was duplication of photos in the electoral list it could mean that there were persons who have more than one voter identity card under different names.
The court said "it would imply that same person can cast votes under more than one name" and directed the poll panel to verify whether errors like same photograph appearing against different names, have been translated into voter ID cards. Assembly polls in Delhi are slated on February 7.
It directed the poll panel to file an affidavit after examining the document filed by petitioner and ex-Congress leader Naresh Kumar, indicating entries in the latest electoral roll showing pictures of same person against different names.
Kumar, who had unsuccessfully contested on a Congress ticket from Mundka in the 2014 Delhi Assembly polls, has alleged the presence of large number of bogus voters in the national capital.
While directing poll authorities to file their affidavit by January 19, next date of hearing, the court observed, "This is a problem not just of this elections, but also of past ones".
It also observed that till date the authorities have only appointed a district-level officer to conduct an enquiry into why error has occurred.
On being asked, the ECI and CEO told the court that they came to know of the errors on December 8 last year. In response to this, the court questioned why the authorities were unaware about the same till then.
In defence, the poll authorities said the errors occurred due to multiple applications by the electors, mistakes in data entry or due to technical glitches which caused duplicate entries.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 13 2015 | 5:31 PM IST

Next Story