HC refuses to quash FIR against Frenchman over bullets in bag

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 15 2017 | 8:57 AM IST
Three live cartridges found in the baggage of a French tourist, going to Goa via Delhi and Mumbai, has put a spanner on his visit to India after Delhi High Court refused to quash the FIR against him under Arms Act.
Herve Croso, 64, had claimed in his plea that when he boarded the plane from Charles de Gaulle airport at Paris, his luggage was screened and no bullets were found.
However, while boarding the connecting flight to Mumbai from IGI Airport, three cartridges were found, based on which an FIR under the Arms Act was lodged against him.
Croso has sought quashing of the FIR on the ground that the live cartridges were not in his bag when he boarded the plane at Paris and someone appears to have kept the bullets in his bag by tampering with it at Delhi Airport where he stayed for about 13 hours before his flight to Mumbai.
Justice A K Pathak dismissed the Frenchman's plea, saying it was being investigated whether the bullets were put in the baggage by tampering with it or he was carrying it himself and since the probe was on, there was no justification in quashing the FIR.
"I am of the view that facts have to be verified during the investigation. Whether the live cartridges were kept by tampering the baggage of petitioner or were carried by the petitioner himself is a subject matter of investigation, which is still on.
"At this stage, when investigations are still in progress, I do not find any justification to entertain the writ petition and quash the FIR," the court said.
According to the petition filed by advocate Ramni Taneja, the case in the trial court has not proceeded further although there have been various miscellaneous hearings from time to time from December 2, 2016.
Croso, who arrived in India on November 30, under a multiple entry tourist visa valid from November 7, 2016 to May 6, 2017, has claimed he has no criminal record whatsoever in France, in India or anywhere else in the world.
He has contended, in his plea, that he was not in "conscious possession" of the bullets and "mere custody without the awareness of the nature of such possession does not amount to any offence under the Arms Act".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 15 2017 | 8:57 AM IST

Next Story