HC rejects PIL against spot fine for traffic violations

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Mar 16 2018 | 8:40 PM IST

The Madras High Court today dismissed a PIL which challenged levying of spot fine for traffic violations by motorists, observing that there was no law that prohibited such a penalty.

The plea was filed by social activist 'Traffic' Ramaswamy seeking a direction to the traffic police not to allegedly harass the public under the guise of spot fine without giving them an opportunity to contest the violations before the court of law.

"The petition in our view is a gross abuse of the process of court. The imposition of fine, including spot fine, on driving in contravention of rules is permissible. There is no law which prohibits collection of spot fines," a bench comprising Chief Justice Indira Banerjee and Justice Abdul Qudddhose said.

In anticipation of stray incidents of police excesses or improprieties or even dishonesty, the court cannot entertain a PIL and stop collection of spot fines from errant drivers, the judges said.

The petitioner referred to a recent incident in which a pregnant woman died after the two-wheeler she was pillion riding with her husband was allegedly kicked by a traffic police personnel near Tiruchirappalli.

The man had allegedly not stopped the vehicle as directed by the police official for not wearing a helmet.

The petitioner contended that a motorist accused of committing a trivial offence must be given a chance and not penalised without any just reason or cause of action.

Rejecting the PIL as not maintainable, the bench said the court was surprised to note that the husband was irresponsible enough to drive his pregnant wife on a motorcycle without wearing a helmet and attempted to escape when the police tried to stop him.

However, it hastened to add that the observation was based on on different news reports and the petitioner's affidavit should not to be construed as the finding of the court.

The bench further made it clear that the observation was not to influence the investigation into the case in any manner and said the incident was unfortunate and required to be probed.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 16 2018 | 8:40 PM IST

Next Story