A division bench, comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice Yashwant Verma, dismissed the PIL filed by one Ritesh Chaudhary who had alleged that the amount of compensation was decided in an "arbitrary" fashion and that the same was in violation of UP Victims Compensation Scheme, 2014.
The court concurred with the contention of the state's Chief Standing Counsel Ramesh Upadhyay that "the petition lacks substantial ground".
The mob had alleged that the family of Akhlaq had slaughtered a cow and consumed its meat.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
