HC rejects PIL on CBSE 'Sanskrit week' celebration circular

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jul 30 2014 | 10:06 PM IST
Madras High Court today dismissed a petition seeking to declare a CBSE circular to observe 'Sanskrit week' as unconstitutional, null and void.
The First bench, comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M Sathyanarayanan dismissed the PIL filed by one P Pugalenthi, an advocate and said it found no merit in the contention.
The bench said it appeared an attempt was made to misconstrue provisions of the circular, the endeavour of which appears to be to encourage one of the languages i.E Sanskrit, in a particular week.
But it does not take away the endeavour to encourage other languages over a period of time, nor in any way dilute use or richness of Tamil language, the bench observed.
"In our view, this is an experiment being carried out by CBSE to find out if Sanskrit language can be encouraged by such a methodology and shutting out even an experiment from being carried out by a specialised Board, with the intervention of judicial proceedings, may not be appropriate. We are thus not inclined to entertain this PIL," the Justices said and dismissed the PIL.
CBSE had issued a communication on June 30 to all heads of school affiliated to CBSE to celebrate 'Sanskrit Week'.
The petitioner alleged that the communication was based on a 'false premise' that Sanskrit is the mother of all languages and at the stake of imposition of a false propaganda as to a particular language.
He also alleged that Sanskrit, which figures at entry 17 in Eighth Schedule to the Constitution, is one of 22 languages included in it and has no special status whatsoever under the Constitution.
The petitioner alleged the essence of this communication "was nothing but imposition of Sanskrit in the young minds of children by means of inculcation of a false notion that learning Sanskrit would enable the students to learn other languages easily."
Pugalenthi also alleged that the language, spoken only by about 14,000 people in the country, cannot be promoted at the cost of the public exchequer, which is violative of Article 14 of the constitution.
Hence he sought to declare the above circular as unconstitutional, null and void.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 30 2014 | 10:06 PM IST

Next Story