HC rejects PILs seeking quota for SC,ST in rural posts

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jan 04 2017 | 11:07 PM IST
The Madras High Court today dismissed a batch of PILsseeking proportionate quota to members belonging to SC and ST community in local bodies in the state saying that there was no mention in the constitution about providing reservation in rural posts like vice-president and vice-chairman.
The first bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice M Sundar dismissed the petitions, one of which was filed by Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi Chief Thol Thirumavalavan, seeking to provide proportionate reservation for members of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe in various posts in town panchayats, municipal councils, village panchayats, panchayat unions and district panchayats.
The bench concurred with the submission of Advocate General that while the President and Chairman are elected directly by the people, the Vice-President and Vice-Chairman are elected indirectly from among the elected members, councillors and there is already reservation provided for the councillors and elected members.
"We find this argument on behalf of the State to be very logical as providing reservation for Vice Presidents and Vice Chairman also will not only shrink the choice of the electorate (members/councilors) but will also result in a double and successive reservation for the same office which will lead to asymmetry," it said.
"Therefore, in this view of the matter, we have no hesitation in holding that providing reservation for Vice Presidents and Vice Chairmen when reservation has already been provided (proportionate to the SC, ST Population) for the electorate which elects them (members/councillors) would lead to a huge asymmetry which is impermissible," it added.
The bench further said "There is no shred of discussion about providing reservation for offices of vice-presidents and vice-chairmen in local bodies, in the Constitution."
"It makes it indisputably clear that the legislative intent and legislative, Parliamentary wisdom is not in favour of providing reservation to the offices in local bodies," the court said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 04 2017 | 11:07 PM IST

Next Story