The high court said the petition filed by lawyers group 'National Lawyers' Campaign for Judicial Transparency and Reforms', some other lawyers and a law student "did not vouch for the authenticity" of the purported suicide note.
Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on each of them, totalling Rs 2.75 lakh, saying the petitioners were "busy-bodies" making "wild allegations".
The judge rejected the plea saying it was based on "mere hearsay" as none of the 11 petitioners had affirmed any of the facts alleged in their plea.
The court noted that while the petition was based on the purported suicide note, "none of the petitioners have seen the original letter or accessed it".
"None of the petitioners can vouch for the authenticity of the note," it said, adding no one appeared to be ready to "stick their neck out" or "vouch for anything" in the plea.
The petitioners, represented by advocate Mathews J Nedumpara, said it was for the police or the CBI to ascertain whether the letter was original and the allegations contained in it were true.
The lawyer said his clients believed it to be true and that was why the petition was filed.
The court refused to accept the contention saying "none of the petitioners were in a position to affirm any of the facts alleged in the petition".
"In view of the above, it appears that petitioners are mere busy-bodies and have filed the petition making wild allegations. The petition is dismissed with costs of Rs 25,000 on each of the petitioner," the court said.
After months of intense political developments, Pul had taken over the reins of Arunachal Pradesh on February 19, 2016 for a brief period but had to relinquish the job following a Supreme Court order in July 2016.
The plea had sought lodging of the FIR and a "cautious and discreet" probe against some former and serving persons holding constitutional posts, as also against some politicians.
The Supreme Court on February 23 had allowed Pul's widow, Dangwimsai Pul, to withdraw her letter for CBI or NIA probe into the allegations.
This letter was not addressed to Chief Justice of India J S Khehar and the second senior-most judge Justice Dipak Misra.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
