Gujarat HC reserves order on The Wire plea against civil court gag

Amit Shah's son Jay Shah has also filed a criminal defamation suit against the author of the article Rohini Singh and termed the article as "scandalous, frivolous, misleading, derogatory, libellous"

File photo
Jay Amit Shah (centre) with Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP Chief Amit Shah (File photo)
Press Trust of India Ahmedabad
Last Updated : Nov 17 2017 | 1:21 PM IST
The Gujarat High Court today reserved its order on a petition filed by online news portal 'The Wire' challenging a gag order passed by a lower court in a civil defamation case filed by BJP chief Amit Shah's son Jay Shah.

Jay Shah submitted his affidavit before the high court judge Paresh Upadhyay today.

In the affidavit, Shah said the appeal against the ex- parte interim order was "not maintainable" and "deserves to be dismissed".

Also Read

He also said the applicant has not given "any justification" for the plea.

The petition was filed by the portal's management, the Foundation for Independent Journalism, challenging the gag order passed by a civil court on October 12 on a story carried by it (The Wire) titled "The Golden Touch of Jay Amit Shah".

The petitioner had told the high court that the order passed by a civil court had not shown how the story had affected Shah's reputation.

The high court, however, had not given interim relief to the petitioner saying that it first wanted to hear the respondent.

The Wire had maintained that the story about the surge of revenue of Shah's company Temple Enterprise Private Ltd was factually correct and based on the documents obtained from a government office.

The lower court had issued the gag order against The Wire in response to a civil defamation suit of Rs 100 crore filed by Shah against the reporters, editors and the company over the article which claimed that his company's turnover rose 16,000 times in one year after the NDA came to power.

The company saw a huge rise in its turnover after the BJP came to power in 2014, and its revenue rose from Rs 50,000 to over Rs 80 crore in one year, the article claimed.

It triggered a political firestorm, with the Congress demanding an inquiry into the matter, while the BJP termed it as "slanderous".

Shah has also filed a criminal defamation suit against the author of the article Rohini Singh, founding editors of the news portal Siddharth Varadarajan, Siddharth Bhatia and M K Venu, managing editor Monobina Gupta, public editor Pamela Philipose and the Foundation for Independent Journalism.

In his suit, Shah termed the article as "scandalous, frivolous, misleading, derogatory, libellous and consisting of several defamatory statements.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 17 2017 | 12:07 AM IST

Next Story