HC restraint on re-construction of Chennai Silks building

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Jul 24 2018 | 10:15 PM IST

The Madras High Court today stayed the ongoing construction work on a multi-storeyed building for a textile showroom here on a plea alleging violation of norms in the approval of plan and raising safety concerns.

The new building of Chennai Silks is coming up in the busy T Nagar at the same location where the earlier structure of the textile major was gutted in a massive fire last year.

A bench comprising justices N Kirubakaran and Krishan Ramasamy granted the interim injunction on the construction after petitioner Kannan Balachandran submitted that 40 per cent of the work on the 8-storeyed building had been completed within 20 days of getting the approval on June 21.

It also granted an interim stay on the reclassification of the area into commercial area from residential area and directed the authorities concerned to appear in the court with related files and explain under what circumstances they granted the approval.

The bench then posted the matter to August 3 for further hearing.

The petitioner alleged that the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority had violated all norms in granting the planning permission for construction of double basements in addition to eight floors for ulterior considerations.

For a special building/multi-storeyed building, space should be created for at least to a stretch of 250 metres along the length of the road abutting the special building and 500 metres for the multi-storeyed building, he submitted.

However, the abutting road width was only 3.7 metres at the site where the under-construction Chennai Silks building was located, he said quoting a fire and rescue service report filed in the court.

Alleging that the construction activity was in violation of the national building code and rules, it also had the risk of posing grave fire safety issues for the thousands of people visiting the showroom and residents in adjoining areas.

He cited a report of the Fire and Rescue Service filed in the court saying that the firemen had found it difficult to reach the showroom to put out the blaze in May last year.

Twelve people were rescued from the seven-storied building after fire broke out on May 31. It was put out a day later and the demolition of the gutted building took several days.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 24 2018 | 10:15 PM IST

Next Story