HC's cannot entertain plea against Armed Forces Tribunal

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 11 2015 | 8:57 PM IST
The Supreme Court today held that High Courts are barred from entertaining pleas under writ jurisdiction against the verdicts of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) in disputes pertaining to armed forces.
A bench of Justices S J Mukhopadhaya and N V Ramana said that if the High Court entertains a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order passed by Armed Forces Tribunal it would "bypass" the machinery of statute as enshrined in the AFT Act.
Section 30 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act stipulates that an appeal against the final decision or order of the Tribunal shall lie in the Supreme Court (other than an order passed under section 19).
"If the High Court entertains a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against order passed by Armed Forces Tribunal under Section 14 or Section 15 of the Act bypassing the machinery of statute ie Sections 30 and 31 of the Act, there is likelihood of anomalous situation for the aggrieved person in praying for relief from this Court," the bench said.
The apex court set aside the order of Delhi High Court which had allowed the writ petition against an army personnel.
"The High Court (Delhi High Court) while entertaining the writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution bypassed machinery created under Sections 30 and 31 of Act. However, we find that Andhra Pradesh High Court and Allahabad High Court had not entertained the petitions under Article 226 and directed the writ petitioners to seek resort under Sections 30 and 31 of the Act.
"Further, the law laid down by this Court, as referred to above, being binding on the High Court, we are of the view that Delhi High Court was not justified in entertaining the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India," the bench said.
The apex court was hearing a bunch of appeals questioning whether the right of appeal under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 against an order of the Tribunal will bar the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India regarding matters related to Armed Forces.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 11 2015 | 8:57 PM IST

Next Story