HC seeks Centre, AAP govt replies on plea against MCD poll

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 14 2017 | 6:02 PM IST
Delhi High Court today sought the responses of the Centre and the AAP government on a plea seeking to quash the notification laying down the manner of allocation of wards for reserved categories and women in the upcoming MCD polls in the national capital.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal also issued notice to the state election commission and three municipal corporations in which the election are scheduled to be held for 272 wards in April.
The court directed all the authorities to file their replies before March 8.
The direction came after the NGO 'We the citizens' moved the court challenging the poll panel's February 6 notification, announcing the election in three corporations.
In its plea, the NGO said the Delhi Municipal Corporation (DMC) in 2011 was divided into three zone -- North Delhi Municipal Corporation, East Delhi Municipal Corporation and South Delhi Municipal Corporation.
In 2012, ahead of the MCD elections, a notification was issued regarding allocation of wards amongst schedule caste, women and general category.
Claiming that the present notification was contrary to the Constitution as well as Section 3 of the DMC Act, the NGO demanded that it should be quashed and a fresh circular issued in accordance with law.
It sought direction to identify and determine the municipal wards for the purpose of reservation for schedule caste, women and general category in terms of Article 243T of the Constitution. The Article provides for reservation of seats for the schedule caste in the municipal area by rotation to different constituency in the municipality.
The plea alleged that the poll panel, government and others agencies have not made reservation to different constituencies in a municipality by rotation.
"This is evident from the fact that in Sultanpur Majra Assembly Constituency (AC 10), there are four municipal wards out of which two were already reserved in the year 2007 for schedule caste. In the year 2012, out of four municipal wards one was reserved for schedule caste women and other three wards were made general," the plea claimed.
It said that by the present notification all four municipal wards in the AC 10 have been reserved for the schedule caste. "Therefore, it is against the provisions of Article 243T and therefore it is unconstitutional," it added.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 14 2017 | 6:02 PM IST

Next Story