A bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice C Hari Shankar also issued notice to the Law Commission of India and directed them to file their reply before the next date of hearing, February 6.
The court was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking quashing of Section 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure (prohibits arrest of detention of women in the execution of the decree for the payment of money).
The plea filed by Anil Kumar alleged that the section gives "unequal and unreasonable protection" to women and that the provision was being misused.
It said that now it has become fashionable "that people, by taking advantage of Section 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure, are intentionally cheating and causing wrongful loss to the banks and NBFCs (non-banking financial companies) by not replaying vehicles, property or personal loans".
"These women are taking an undue advantage of Section 56 due to its discrimination. Women defaulters are well aware that they are protected by section 56 and no recovery of money could be effected without fear of arrest or detention," the plea alleged.
Section 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure is against the basis structure of the Constitution where the discrimination and the inequality is totally prohibited on the basis of sex, race and religion, the plea contended.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
