HC seeks cops' reply on plea to quash FIR agnst Swati Maliwal

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Sep 26 2016 | 7:42 PM IST
Delhi High Court today asked the police to reply to a plea by Delhi Commission for Women (DCW) for quashing of an FIR lodged against its chief Swati Maliwal for allegedly revealing the identity of a 14-year-old Dalit rape victim who had succumbed to her injuries.
Justice A K Pathak also asked the police to respond to the plea which has urged it to form a Special Investigating Team (SIT) to investigate the case, while criticising the way Delhi Police has been handling the matter.
During the hearing, the bench asked senior advocate R S Cheema, appearing for DCW, as to how the Commission could approach the court for quashing of an FIR lodged against its chief.
"How can the DCW file the petition for quashing of an FIR. The FIR was lodged against an individual, who should have moved the court in individual capacity. She (Maliwal) should have filed a separate petition. How can she file through the Commission," the judge asked.
Maintaining that they had rightly filed the petition, the counsel submitted that the FIR was wrongly lodged as under the law the name of rape victim, who was a minor, could be disclosed with the consent of the parents and in this case, the consent was obtained from the girl's family members.
The court fixed the matter for November 8.
The minor girl had died in hospital after a neighbour raped her repeatedly in North Delhi's Burari area on July 23 and forced a corrosive substance down her throat which damaged her internal organs.
Delhi Police had said Maliwal circulated a notice she had sent to the area Deputy Commissioner of Police, in which she had asked how investigators were handling the rape case. The notice handed out to print and electronic journalists had the name of the victim.
The FIR alleged that the notice was intentionally circulated on various WhatsApp groups and shown by TV channels. A news channel had held the notice before the camera during a prime-time programme aired on July 25, it added.
"To divulge the name of the rape victim is an offence," the police had said.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 26 2016 | 7:42 PM IST

Next Story