HC seeks data on FIRs filed in crimes against women with or without direction from court

Image
Press Trust of India Jodhpur
Last Updated : Aug 19 2019 | 10:45 PM IST

Stating that it was painful that police do not register complaints on sexual crimes on time, the Rajasthan High Court has sought from district judges data on all FIRs registered on orders of courts related to crimes against women and POCSO Act within their respective jurisdictions during the last six months.

Cases under IPC sections 376 (rape), 354 (assault with intent to outrage the modesty of woman), 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), 304B (death caused by burn or injury), 306 (abetment of suicide) and 306B will be included in this.

A bench of Chief Justice S R Bhat and Justice Dinesh Mehta has also directed the state government to file an affidavit on the number of FIRs under same sections registered independently by police without directions from the court for the same period of six months.

"In both the cases, the statistics to be filed by the District Judges and figures to be provided by the state of Rajasthan, the period shall be from January 1 to June 20 this year, said the order of the court.

While giving the directions, the court expressed its displeasure to Additional Advocates General (AAG) Karan Singh, saying it was painful that the police do not file the report of sexual crimes on time.

The court has directed to submit the data in four weeks time from the date of order and has listed the matter for next hearing on September 24, said AAG Singh adding that based on the data, the court would draw conclusion about the seriousness of the police in dealing with crimes against women.

The bench gave these directions after taking suo motu note of "negligence" of the police in registering cases pertaining to crime against women in the state.

It appears that the administration and the police have turned incapable. There are the reports of rape one after another in the state. It is a matter of huge concern, the court had observed and issued notices to the state government on May 27.

The court had also summoned ADG (Civil Rights), who submitted before the court that the police was serious about such crimes and have been adopting hi-tech methods to deal with them

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 19 2019 | 10:45 PM IST

Next Story