HC seeks UP's response on reservation to OBCs

Image
Press Trust of India Allahabad
Last Updated : Sep 11 2013 | 9:01 PM IST
The Allahabad High Court has asked the UP government to respond to a petition alleging that "illegal" reservations was being given to OBCs though they have "already surpassed" what can be said to be adequate representation in government services.
The order was passed by Justice Sudhir Agarwal on a petition filed by Sumit Kumar Shukla and others who had "prayed that since the representation in respect to various categories of OBCs has already crossed the stage of adequate representation, it should be stayed and should not be continued".
The petitioners have also alleged that "for reasons other than bona fide", the state has been reluctant "to make an investigation about the extent of representation of various categories in public services to find out whether continuance of reservation to those categories is valid or not," notwithstanding directions to these effect issued in the past by the High Court as well as the Supreme Court.
The petitioners had also sought to show, through statistical figures, that representation of OBCs in public services was quite high way back in 2001 itself and that "in the last more than a decade, since reservation has continued, the representation percentage must have gone up".
The order was passed on September 9 and the court has fixed September 30 as the next date of hearing in the matter.
The court directed the UP government to file a counter-affidavit with special emphasis on the points "what is the criteria of representation to hold that a class is adequately represented or not."
The court also asked "whether any investigation has been done or any committee was constituted in last 10 years to find out what is the present status of representation various castes/classes in various state services in which reservation is continuing" and "if any Commission report is available and consequential action, if any".
The court also ordered that the affidavit "shall be filed by a person not below the rank of Special Secretary, who is authorised by Secretary (Appointment)".
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 11 2013 | 9:01 PM IST

Next Story