HC sets aside 2 different GOs

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Apr 30 2014 | 12:06 AM IST
Madras High Court today set aside two different Government Orders issued in 2012 and 2014, prescribed for awarding weightage marks to candidates who appeared in the teachers eligibility test.
The orders were of October 5, 2012 of School Education (Q) Department and another one of February 14, 2014 of School Education (TRB) department.
While setting aside these two orders, Justice S Nagamuthu however upheld another order prescribing five per cent relaxation of marks for certain categories.
In his order, he directed Government to issue a GO expeditiously, prescribing a scientific rational method for awarding weightage marks for Teachers Eligibility Test.
The state government had constituted a committee to evolve the methodolgy for selecting candidates.
"A close perusal of proceedings of the committee would go to show that the committee did not consider the merits and demerits of the grading system adopted. The committee has only considered the methodology followed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal and simply recommended to adopt the same," the judge said.
The judge said that there has been total non application of mind on the government's part while issuing the impunged GOs.
The Judge noted that experts in statistics were not included in the committee nor was opinion obtained from them and said the committee constituted to evolve the methodology to select candidates cannot be stated to be an expert body.
He also said no scientific study was conducted by any expert body before introducing the system and it has to be necessarily held that the methodology stipulated in the GOs suffers from arbitrary exercise of power of the government.
The judge flayed the grading method prescribed and also the government for not examining if the method was reasonable and would achieve the object, if any.
The Judge said it is the court's constitutional obligation to set aside the same instead of leaving it to perpetuate.
He dismissed petitions seeking relief to award weightage marks as per the GO and suggested the government prescribe any other scientific method to award weightage marks.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 30 2014 | 12:06 AM IST

Next Story