HC sets aside fine imposed on Dharamshila Cancer Hospital

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 02 2016 | 6:07 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today set aside the AAP government's order imposing over Rs 17 crore fine on Dharamshila Cancer Hospital for allegedly refusing to provide free treatment to poor patients after the government said it would hear afresh the hospital authorities on the issue.
The government told Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva that it has considered the representation of the hospital and has decided to grant another hearing on August 17.
Besides Dharamshila Cancer Hospital, the government had asked four other Delhi-based private hospitals -- Max Super Specialty Hospital (Saket), Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, Shanti Mukand Hospital and Pushpawati Singhania Research Institute -- to deposit the alleged "unwarranted profits" they earned from allegedly refusing free treatment to the poor.
In a similar relief to Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, the high court had yesterday set aside the order imposing over Rs 100 crore fine on it after the government had said it would hear the hospital authorities afresh.
During the brief hearing today, the Delhi government's counsel told the court that the special committee would hear the hospital authorities on August 17 and would then decide on the issue.
"In view of the above, the impugned order dated June 7, 2016 is set aside," Justice Sachdeva said while disposing of the plea filed by the hospital.
The court had earlier sought the original records of the special committee, appointed to look into the affairs of the hospitals as per a 2007 high court order. The committee had recommended imposition of Rs 17.86 crore fine on Dharamshila Hospital.
The fine was imposed on the hospital for allegedly not providing free treatment to poor patients as per its land allotment lease condition.
Dharamshila Cancer Hospital had approached the court seeking stay on the government's decision claiming it was not given a proper hearing.
The health department had earlier told the court that the hospitals were provided land at concessional rates between 1960 and 1990 on the condition that they will treat the poor free of cost, but they did not abide by it.
43 private hospitals in Delhi were allotted land at concessional rates on condition that they will keep 10 per cent of their in-patient department capacity and 25 per cent of out-patient department capacity to treat economically weaker section patients free of cost.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 02 2016 | 6:07 PM IST

Next Story