HC slams customs dept for not obeying court orders

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 03 2016 | 6:13 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today came down heavily on the customs department for not obeying judicial orders, including that of the Supreme Court, on the issue of duty payable on imported goods, saying that there was "no justification" for not complying with the directions.
A bench of Justices S Muralidhar and Najmi Waziri said, "There was no legal ground for not obeying the orders" of the apex court and the high court and directed the department to pay costs of Rs 10,000 to Indian consumer electronics company, Yu Televentures.
The court also set aside the department's June 7 order rejecting the refund claim of the firm, a joint venture of Cyanogen Inc and Micromax Informatics Ltd, which has claimed that it was charged a higher rate of additional customs duty despite being eligible for a concession.
The court said it saw "no reason why department should delay grant of refund" and directed that the Rs 2,10,96,725 amount claimed be refunded within two weeks.
The court also refused the oral plea on behalf of the department that it be allowed to consider other aspects before deciding the refund claim, saying the official concerned would not be allowed to add any new aspects as he had arrived at the conclusion to reject claim after examining all the documents.
The mobile phone company, in its plea filed through advocates Shashi Mathews and Tarun Gulati, had contended that it paid six per cent duty amounting to Rs 2,10,96,725 when it was eligible for the concessional rate of one per cent.
The company has said that the apex court had held that importer of goods would be entitled to exemption from payment of additional duty and alleged that the department ignored the ruling.
The firm also alleged that the department said it has not accepted the high court's judgements in two similar matters, one involving Micromax, as an SLP is pending in one and in the other an SLP was going to be filed in the apex court.
"There is no excuse to not comply with the binding law only because appeal is pending," the bench said and added that the apex court has not stayed the verdict in either of the two cases.
The bench ordered that a copy of the order be sent to the Commissioner of Customs, Air Cargo Export, for taking appropriate action in accordance with the law against the official concerned.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 03 2016 | 6:13 PM IST

Next Story