"There is no clarity how evaluation was carried out. Let them (NDMC) re-evaluate properly. As of now there does not appear any rational behind it. It is illogical, irrational and we are finding it absurd. The process is absurd," a bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Ashutosh Kumar said.
It asked the lawyer for New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) to take instructions on what the civic body wishes to do, saying "fact of the matter is it needs to be e-evaluated".
The court was hearing a plea by a coaching centre run by an 84-year-old Dronacharya awardee who has alleged favouritism in grant of the contract to IGMA Sports Management instead of his centre, Dronacharya Cricket Foundation (DCF).
In his plea filed through advocates Aditya Chaudhary and Manish Bishnoi, Gurcharan Singh, who runs DCF, has alleged that IGMA is promoted by a cricketer who has no experience in coaching.
NDMC denied Singh's allegations, saying a committee was set up to evaluate all the bids and marks were awarded primarily on the basis of national and international awards won by the coaches and also their trainees.
The court, however, disagreed with the evaluation process, saying "we are not happy with this".
It said that as per the records before it, none of the coaches of IGMA had won a national award as a coach, while Singh himself got the Dronacharya award, the highest in India in this field.
The bench said if national and international awards were a criteria, then IGMA would get zero marks.
To this IGMA contended that its coaches had won awards and tournaments as players and the tender requirements do not specifically say the coaches have to win awards as coaches.
The court did not agree with this line of argument either, saying that this was not a reason for rejecting the bid of Singh, who claims to have trained international cricketers like Kapil Dev and Kirti Azad.
On the last date of hearing, the court had asked NDMC to bring the documents pertaining to grant of the contract and after perusing them today, it was of the view that the process was "illogical and irrational".
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
