HC strikes down Odisha govt's amendment to ZP poll rules

Image
Press Trust of India Cuttack
Last Updated : Mar 30 2017 | 10:22 PM IST
The Orissa High Court today struck down an amendment brought in by the state government in the Odisha Zilla Parishad Election Rules of 1994.
Striking down the amendment effected on March 8, a division bench led by Chief Justice Vineet Saran observed that rules, laws or acts governing a particular election shall not be altered during the intervening period once the process of polling has started.
After the polling for the panchayat elections started in the state in February, the Panchayati Raj department incorporated a new clause in the 1994 Rules, four days before the scheduled March 12 elections for the posts of chairmen of the district councils.
The new clause provided for appointment of agents by every political party and the election officer was empowered to allow the authorised agents to check the vote cast by an elected member of their respective parties as is the practice during Rajya Sabha elections.
Challenging the impugned amendment, an elected zilla parishad member of Sundargarh district had approached the High Court contending that it can not be brought in midway, once the process of election has started.
Arguing against the petition, the state government had told the court that the amendment was made to ensure transparency and prevent cross-voting in the elections for the posts of chairmen and vice-chairmen of the district councils.
The State Election Commission (SEC), on the other hand, had objected to the alteration of rules midway saying that the settled law was that no government or court should interfere with the election once the process had started.
Today's High Court judgment is likely to have an impact on the just-concluded elections for the posts of chairmen and vice-chairmen of the district councils which were held under the impugned amendment.
While opposition BJP and Congress have started raising a demand for fresh elections, the ruling BJD is mulling filing a review petition in the High Court or approaching the Supreme Court.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 30 2017 | 10:22 PM IST

Next Story