HC to hear plea seeking lodging of FIR against CBI officials

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 09 2017 | 8:28 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today agreed to hear a plea seeking registration of an FIR against senior officials of the CBI for allegedly making false statements in connection with alleged irregularities in purchase of items for surgery department and trauma centre of AIIMS.
"We are not going to pass any order today, but we will hear it on July 21," a bench of Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal and Justice V K Rao said.
The application was moved in a pending PIL filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation seeking a probe into a number of corruption cases at AIIMS which were unearthed by former Chief Vigilance Officer Sanjiv Chaturvedi during his tenure between 2012 and 2014.
The application filed through advocate Prashant Bhushan alleged that "the agency has lied" in its affidavit that it has not received any information from Chaturvedi in relation to the then store-keeper of AIIMS -- Jai Prakash Narayan Apex (JPNA) Trauma Centre.
Recently, the Indian Forest Service officer, presently serving as Conservator of Forest (Research) at Haldwani in Uttarakhand, had opposed the stand of Ministry of Health and Family Welfare on the issue.
The submissions by the ministry and the officer were made in the pending petition by the NGO.
The NGO, in its PIL, had claimed that despite there being prima facie findings of corruption by CBI and the then CVO against some of senior functionaries of AIIMS, no steps were being taken to register a case.
The NGO had also alleged that an attempt was being made to close the cases through collusive departmental enquiry.
However, CBI, in its latest affidavit, has said "it is submitted that CBI in its findings have found no criminality on the part of officials or officers of AIIMS and hence no FIR was registered".
The CBI's stand was similar to that of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare which, in its reply to the NGO's application, has said the allegations made against some of senior officials "could not be established".

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 09 2017 | 8:28 PM IST

Next Story