HC to set up special bench to hear street vendors' pleas

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 08 2016 | 5:42 PM IST
The Delhi High Court today decided to set up a special bench to hear petitions against eviction of street vendors from vending zones in the national capital.
A bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal said there were large numbers of petitions pending before different courts on the issue, which was creating problems in adjudication.
It said every day fresh pleas were being filed in the high court against the authorities or the order of a single judge on the eviction issue.
"We will constitute a special bench so that all these types of matters are dealt by one bench," the court said.
The court decided to set up the special bench after it was told that some matters were pending before the single judge and it has passed orders contrary to the division bench.
Recently, a bench of the Chief Justice had granted protection to street vendors across Delhi from forcible eviction.
The order was passed on pleas filed by Congress leader Ajay Maken and others, who said the Delhi government had failed to prepare a scheme in consultation with Town Vending Committee (TVC) as per Street Vendors Act, 2014 to conduct a survey to ascertain the number and location of vendors, even when the law clearly envisages that till a survey of all existing street vendors is completed, no street vendor shall be evicted or relocated.
Maken and other petitioners had alleged that municipal bodies of central and south Delhi were "throwing out" street vendors from hawking zones, despite a court order protecting them from such action.
In their pleas, they contended that the bench on October 5 had ruled that its September 9 order that no street vendor should be evicted from the city roads without due process of law, shall not be applicable on non-hawking zones.
They had said that under the garb of this order, New Delhi Municipal Council and South Delhi Municipal Corporation were evicting vendors even from hawking zones like Rajiv Chowk, Indira Chowk and Lajpat Nagar and sought that they be restrained from taking any coercive action.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 08 2016 | 5:42 PM IST

Next Story