HC upholds Tribunal order quashing dismissal of BoI employee

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Dec 14 2013 | 4:40 PM IST
The Bombay High Court has refused to interfere with a Central Industrial Tribunal's order which quashed the dismissal of a woman employee of the Bank of India, and asked the Bank to treat her as if she has opted for voluntary retirement from service and grant her all benefits.
"I am not inclined to interfere with the impugned order. The concerned workman (the employee) served the petitioner bank for 32 years," said Justice R V More of the high court in a recent order.
"In 1996-97, she was suffering from cancer. Her son at the relevant time was in USA and she wanted to visit USA for treatment. The record shows that she had applied for leave which was orally sanctioned. However, written application was not sanctioned," the judge noted.
The presiding officer of Tribunal, considering the length of service of the employee with the Bank and conduct in applying for leave as well as permission to leave India, coupled with the fact that she was suffering from cancer, took a sympathetic view, said the judge.
The judge noted that the Tribunal had also considered the fact that this employee had also applied for voluntary retirement scheme and held that the punishment of dismissal would be too harsh. Hence, he set aside the dismissal while asking the Bank to allow the person to opt for voluntary retirement with effect from November 1, 2000.
The high court held that directions of the Tribunal were given in exercise of discretion.
"In my view, the discretion is used judiciously", said Justice More.
The court also refused to stay its order to enable Bank of India to file an appeal before a division bench.
The employee, Vasantbala Parmar, was dismissed by the Bank for professional misconduct with effect from January 31, 2002.
Parmar moved the Tribunal which held that enquiry against the employee was in keeping with the principles of natural justice. The charges against her were also proved.
However, dismissal was set aside and her case for voluntary statement was allowed.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 14 2013 | 4:40 PM IST

Next Story