HC warns of action for non-implementation of noise pollution

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Jun 24 2015 | 4:28 PM IST
The Bombay High Court today asked the Maharashtra government Chief Secretary to identify officers responsible for not implementing noise pollution rules so that contempt action could be taken against them.
A bench headed by Justice Abhay Oka rapped the state for not following its previous orders regarding implementation of noise pollution rules and removing illegal 'pandals' (temporary structures) in public places and on roads and footpaths during festivals.
"Two months have passed and the government has failed to implement the directives of the High Court. The state has taken the HC orders very casually...All that the government has done is to address letters to the Principal Secretaries of Urban Development, Revenue and Environment departments, inviting their attention to the HC orders," said the bench.
"Proceedings of contempt have to be initiated against the concerned officers," the judges said and asked the Chief Secretary to identify the officers with their names and designation who are responsible for not implementing noise pollution rules.
The court asked the Chief Secretary to file an affidavit on these lines by July 3.
The HC was hearing a public interest litigation filed by Dr Mahesh Bedekar from neighbouring Thane district, raising concern over the nuisance created by various organisers of religious festivals with regard to noise pollution and erection of pandals on streets and footpaths.
Hearing the petition in March, the HC had observed that every citizen has a fundamental right to silence and to live in peace and comfort and the same cannot be disturbed by organisers celebrating various religious festivals.
The HC had then asked the government to frame a policy and set up a redressal mechanism by which common citizens can lodge complaints on which prompt action should be taken by authorities concerned before the festivals get over.
However, the court was informed at a previous hearing that no such policy had been framed by the government. Further, the state government had failed to take any action against organisers for violation of noise pollution rules and erecting illegal pandals in public places, like outside schools, hospitals and bus stops, it was averred.
The HC had in March directed the authorities concerned to withdraw licences of those Ganpati mandals which violate the rules. However, the same has not been done, the court was told.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jun 24 2015 | 4:28 PM IST

Next Story