Higher cigarette taxes may do more harm than good!

Image
Press Trust of India Washington
Last Updated : Oct 29 2015 | 5:02 PM IST
Increasing cigarette taxes may encourage smokers to seek more dangerous products with higher nicotine content rather than help them quit smoking, researchers including one of Indian-origin have found.
A new study shows that while counter-marketing techniques often reduce total consumption of cigarettes, increasing cigarette taxes per package shifts some consumers to higher nicotine products.
Given the addictive properties of nicotine, this result increases addiction levels for some consumers.
By conducting the analysis on US data about store sales, the researchers examined populations of consumers that were exposed to different tax rates, advertising levels, and smoking prohibitions.
In addition, data from the US Census on ZIP code demographics allowed the researchers to examine the effectiveness of counter-marketing across consumers of different socio-economic levels.
"We find that the different anti-smoking techniques varied in terms of effectiveness," said Mike Lewis from Emory University in US.
"Taxes that directly increase the prices faced by consumers are the most effective technique in reducing consumption of cigarettes," Lewis said.
"Health-oriented advertising is also effective. Smoke-free air policies such as restaurant or workplace bans on smoking are the least effective," he said.
"However, while taxes are the most effective technique reducing smoking rates, we find that this tool has a significant downside," said Vishal Singh, from New York University.
"Because cigarette taxes are currently applied at the per pack level and without regard to nicotine levels, consumers may respond to increasing cigarette taxes by switching to higher nicotine products," Singh said.
"In other words, if consumers desire to minimise the cost per unit of nicotine, then increasing cigarette taxes may lead some consumers to shift to higher nicotine products," Singh said.
"This unintended consequence of cigarette taxes can have significant health consequences since higher nicotine levels will increase addiction levels," he said.
Importantly, the researchers also found that this unintended consequence was more likely to occur in poorer neighbourhoods.
A possible explanation for this disparate impact is that the lower socio-economic level of these consumers leads to a greater emphasis on minimising nicotine costs.
The study was published in the journal Marketing Science.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 29 2015 | 5:02 PM IST

Next Story