Justices P R Sivakumar and V S Ravi allowed their appeal on the ground that the entire process of summoning Kalidoss's son to the police station, being told that the two were the accused, asked to identify them in an identification parade, which he did, and other witnesses admitting they did so only after seeing photos shown by police, was against Evidence Act.
The prosecution case was that that Kalidoss, who reportedly gave speeches against the minority community, was also the main witness in the murder of HMK leader Rajagopalan.
Seven accused members had developed enmity against Kalidoss and conspired to kill him on June 21, 2005, they said.
Kalidoss was killed in the city that day when he was on way to meet a friend.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
