Hope LDF govt in Ker will support motion seeking Governor's

Image
Press Trust of India Thiruvananthapuram
Last Updated : Jan 27 2020 | 4:15 PM IST

: Opposition Congress leader Ramesh Chennithala on Monday expressed hope the Left government in Kerala would completely support his proposed motion in the state Assembly to recall Governor Arif Mohammed Khan on his stand over CAA.

The notice seeking permission to move the resolution in the upcoming budget session was given to uphold the dignity of the state Assembly and its members, he said.

"Actually, it should have been moved by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. I am compelled to come up with the motion as the CM failed to do his duty as the leader of the House," Chennithala told reporters here.

"I hope that as the leader of a party which has taken a stand that even the post of the Governor is unwanted, Vijayan and his government will support the resolution in the House completely," he said.

The Congress leader's statement comes a day after the ruling CPI(M)-led Left Democratic Front and state Parliamentary Affairs minister, A K Balan criticised his decision to move the resolution seeking the recalling of the Governor under the Rule 130 of the legislative business.

Chennithala had said on Saturday he had given a notice to Speaker P Sreeramakrishnan seeking his permission to move the resolution demanding Khan's recall for "violating" all democratic principles and "publicly questioning" the pride of the legislature through his stand over CAA.

He had accused the Governor of publicly challenging the unanimous resolution passed by the state Assembly against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act 2019 enacted by the Parliament during its winter session.

However, Khan had welcomed the move stating that he was functioning as per the Constitution.

Coming down heavily on the Chief Minister, Chennithala alleged Vijayan was reluctant to utter even a word against the Governor even if Khan had infringed into the privileges of the state assembly by repeatedly stating that the resolution unanimously passed by it against CAA was "unconstitutional."

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 27 2020 | 4:15 PM IST

Next Story