In poll year, Shinde trying to engage in vote-bank politics:

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 11 2014 | 6:20 PM IST
Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde's proposal to write to chief ministers to review terror cases against members of the minority community is based on an improper policy and was clearly unconstitutional as it comes with an eye on vote-bank politics in an election year, BJP said today.
Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha, Arun Jaitley, said that the states were not bound by such directives to form an "extra legal" review committee which would substitute the discretion of the public prosecutor and the judge, who can suggest and decide, respectively, whether a case is to be withdrawn.
The idea is clearly violative of even the provisions of criminal law, he added.
"A move that only a certain category of cases would be reviewed on the eve of elections is intended to link the otherwise uniform application of criminal law with vote-bank politics," Jaitley said.
The proposed directive/advisory by Shinde to states to discriminate between criminals on the basis of religion is founded on an "improper" policy.
"It violates the constitutional guarantee of equality. It is violative of the fundamental principles and provisions of criminal law. States are not bound by such unconstitutional directives of the Home Minister," he said
Shinde, he said, had only the religious minorities and not the linguistic minorities in mind as he expects states to set up review committees to deal only with cases against a category of citizens and not all persons facing terrorism charges.
"This raises certain fundamental questions as regards the propriety and the legality of the move initiated by the Home Minister. The move is clearly political," he said.
He cited cases of Islamist groups, majority community members and even Maoists who are accused in terror cases and questioned whether Shinde's proposal includes them as well.
"A crime does not cease to be a crime because a criminal practices a particular faith," he said and wondered whether cases against Hindus, who are a minority in the northeastern states and Jammu and Kashmir, would also be reviewed.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 11 2014 | 6:20 PM IST

Next Story