Independent body for Panchayat polls: House panel reiterates

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Aug 12 2015 | 6:07 PM IST
A Parliamentary panel today voiced displeasure over "casual" reply of the government to its recommendations for exploring the feasibility of having an independent body to conduct Panchayat polls and made a strong pitch for having such a body and also for spreading awareness about programmes of Panchayati Raj Ministry.
The Standing Committee on Rural Development, headed by AIADMK leader P Venugopal in its 12th report which was tabled in both the Houses of Parliament today rued the ministry has not taken panel's recommendation in "right perspective".
In the 12th report of the panel on Ministry of Panchayati Raj, Venugopal said taking into account the need for regular elections of Panchayats throughout the country, the Committee had recommended the government to explore the feasibility of having an independent body like a Central Panchayat Election Commission for conducting the Panchayat polls in the states in free and fair manner.
"In their action-taken reply, the ministry has merely informed the Committee the fact that elections of Panchayats are conducted by State Election Commission under Article 243 K of the Constitution of India.
"The Committee while advising the government for exploring the possibility of an independent election body for Panchayats was well aware of the Constitutional provisions and the idea was to explore as to whether any better alternative mechanism could be put in place...
"The Committee therefore expresses displeasure over such casual reply of the ministry to an important recommendation of the Committee," it said.
Reiterating its recommendation, the panel said it must be explored by the ministry in consultation with all concerned including Ministry of Law and Justice and asked Government to apprise it of steps taken in this regard within three months.
Recalling that the committee had recommended full and optimum utilisation of its budgetary allocations for creating awareness among the rural population, through electronic and print media, the panel noted the reply of the government shows that in "contrary to the recommendation of the committee, not only there was a cut of Rs 10 crore but also a reappropriation of Rs 4.4 crore from media and publicity schemes.
"The committee expresses serious displeasure over the callous attitude of the ministry in this regard and strongly reiterates their recommendation to give full focus on wide publicity...," it said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Aug 12 2015 | 6:07 PM IST

Next Story