Inspector, welfare home in-charge told to appear in court

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Oct 27 2014 | 8:46 PM IST
Madras High Court today directed the Inspector of a police station in Villupuram district and the officer in-charge of a child welfare home there to appear in court on October 29 to explain why they had not obtained any competent orders from any court before keeping a rescued minor girl in a child welfare home for a week.
The Division bench comprising Justice S Rajeswaran and Justice T Mathivanan stated this when a Haebeas Corpus Petition filed by the brother of a 16-year-old girl came up today.
The bench questioned the Sub-Inspector of Kallakurichi Policed station and the woman constable, who produced her in court today, if they had produced her in any court or procured competent orders from any court to keep her in the Don Bosco Home, to which both were unable to give a satisfactory answer.
The bench then directed the officer-in-charge of the Home and the Inspector of Kallakurichi Police Station to appear before the court on October 29 to submit an explanation.
The matter relates to the girl who was reported missing after she went to school and did not return home on July 21.
The brother submitted that he had made enquries and come to know that she was kidnapped by a man and that his family were keeping the whereabouts of both him and the girl secret.
So he filed a complaint on July 28 and also requested police to take effective steps in securing his sister as he apprehended danger to her life.
Since no steps were taken till date, as a specially mentioned case it was taken up by the division bench today and the girl was produced by police before the court.
Besides her brother, her parents were also present in the court, which allowed her to go with them after she expressed willingness to do so.
At this juncture, the bench questioned police as to when they had secured the girl, to which they replied that they had done so last week and kept her in the home.
On being questioned under whose orders she was allowed to be kept in the home and whether she was produced before any Judicial Magistrate before being admitted, police were unable to give a satisfactory answer.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 27 2014 | 8:46 PM IST

Next Story