Institutions of learnings have become war zones: Scholars

Amid a raging political battle over a Dalit scholar's suicide, a group of scholars today said institutions of learning had become war zones in the last 10 to 15 years and poor students entering the campuses are seen as fodder in the ideological war of their mentors.
The 40 scholars, perceived to be sympathetic to the Modi government, said the death of Rohith Vemula had brought forth the rot which had set in these years and called for action to save the academia from the clutches of this new brand of academics in the university faculties.
"Act swiftly to save the Indian academia from the clutches of this new brand of academics in the university faculties and their peers in the higher academic governance of India. The people at the helm of affairs in the higher governing bodies of Indian academia have remained largely unchanged.

"These persons in position of authority have continued to further vitiate the atmosphere in our institutions of higher learning," they said in an open statement.
ICHR member M D Srinivas, Madhu Purnima Kishwar of the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, IIT Chennai faculty Shreepad Karmalkar, Vipin Chaturvedi of the University of California, Atal Bihari Vajpayi Hindi Vishwavidhyalaya Vice Chancellor Mohan Lal Chhipa, Makrand R Paranjpe, Aswhini Mohapatra of the JNU, R Vaidyanathan of the IIM, Bangalore and J K Bajaj of the Centre for Policy Studies, Chennia and Delhi are among the signatories to the statement.
"Over the last 10 or 15 years, a new brand of scholarship has transformed the meaning of high academics in such a manner as to convert our high institutions of learning into some kind of war zones. Under the influence of such scholars and their peers in the higher echelons of academic governance, the young scholars joining these institutions are being led astray.

Rohith's death is not the first that has happened there

nor will it be the last unless the atmosphere in our campuses is radically corrected, the 40 national and international scholars suggested, adding that the atmosphere of discord and discontent created in the campuses had led to several suicides in the past.
Responding to Rohith' suicide in the Hyderabad Central University, they said he joined the university to become a scholar and was made an agitator instead.
In his "celebrated" suicide note of the student, his conflict is reflected even more strongly than the 'accident of birth' highlighted by many, they said.

"We condemn the attempt to use the tragic death of a young scholar to further distort the academic atmosphere in India," they added.
Such scholars have not only come to dominate the social science faculties of our institutions but their peers have also managed to occupy high positions of power in various councils and commissions that govern and guide the Indian academia, they said.
In their suggestions to change things, they said there was a need to protect the academia from the on-going political and ideological warfare by strongly discouraging angry and agitational ways of the teachers and students on the campuses.

"Moderate and restrain the voices of anger, abuse and discord on the campuses at least as strongly as these are in the society outside. The angry academics entrenched in these institutions must not be allowed to continue their ideological wars in the name of academic autonomy," they said.
They also called for starting a comprehensive review of the direction that the social sciences have taken in the country and audit the academic work done in the major institutions of learning during the last ten years.