Ishrat Jahan case: BJP cites role of Chidambaram, Manmohan Singh in changing affidavit

Said that CBI was misused by the then UPA government to harass its political opponent and "defame" Narendra Modi

Ishrat Jahan
File Photo of Ishrat Jahan. Pakistani-American terrorist David Headley claimed on Thursday that Ishrat Jahan was an operative of terror outfit Lashkar-e-Taiba. Photo: PTI
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 02 2016 | 2:09 PM IST
BJP today alleged that the decision to change the affidavit in Ishrat Jahan encounter case was taken at the "political level", involving the then Home Minister P Chidambaram, then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Congress President Sonia Gandhi. It has further asked Congress to come clean on the issue.

Parliamentary Affairs Minister M Venkaiah Naidu charged that CBI was misused by the then UPA government to harass its political opponent and "defame" the then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi, who is now Prime Minister.

Read more from our special coverage on "ISHRAT JAHAN"



He said the issue needs to be debated and discussed in Parliament and appropriate action needs to be taken.

"First it was Lashkar-e-Taiba's website, secondly it was David Headley's statement and thirdly it was central government affidavit in the Gujarat High Court and Gujarat Police also said it. IB has said it. In spite of all these, they changed the affidavit."

"Now another startling revelation by former Home Secretary G K Pillai (who is) saying that the decision to change the affidavit was taken at the political level. Political level means the then Home Minister P Chidambaram, Prime Minister and Congress President. These are the three people who were at the helm of affairs," Naidu said.

He also cited former Under Secretary in Home Ministry R V S Mani's statement that he was forced and tortured.

"The torturing of government officer by other agency at the behest of political leadership, you can understand how much misuse was done by the previous government with regard to CBI. How political opponents were harassed. The entire plan was to stop Narendra Modi, defame Narendra Modi, implicate Narendra Modi," he said.

"Congress party should come clean instead of simply denying it. What do you say? What is the justification for change in affidavit? Do you have an answer? explain," he said.

Naidu further said his government was ready to discuss all matters in Parliament.

Leader of Congress party in Lok Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge said it would be better if Chidambaram speaks on the matter. "I do not have details on it. It would be better if Chidambaram speaks on it. I do not want to comment on it," Kharge said.

Congress spokesman Abhishek Singhvi had accused BJP of spreading a lie about American-Pakistani terrorist David Headley and said it was "very unfortunate" that the ruling party was resorting to false propaganda.

The trigger for the recent political battle is the interview of Mani, who had filed two affidavits. In the interview, Mani alleged he was tortured to implicate senior IB officials in the case to project the encounter killing of Ishrat and other three LeT terrorists in Ahmedabad in 2004 as fake.

Mani suggested that Chidambaram was behind the decision to file the second affidavit. He alleged that the then chief of Special Investigation Team (SIT) going into the case, a CBI official, was after him and an attempt was made to question the quality of professional inputs by the intelligence agencies on Ishrat and other terrorists.

Speaking on the matter, CPI(M) Politburo member Brinda Karat said there has been an encounter killing. "Whether or not Ishrat Jahan was an LeT operative is a different issue and that issue is before the Supreme Court. Let the Supreme Court come to its own conclusion. But the basic issue here is that it was an encounter killing," she said.

Road, Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari said at that time, the Congress party and former Home Minister Chidambaram had done some activities which were "anti-national".

"It is sort of helping terrorists and the issue should be investigated and the culprits should be punished," Gadkari said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 02 2016 | 2:02 PM IST

Next Story