"The present complaint has been filed in personal capacity. On perusing the material on record, I take cognizance of the offences. Matter be now put up for complainant evidence on January 5," Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Sanjay Khanagwal said.
Senior advocate Siddharth Luthra, who appeared for Jaitley, told the court that the accused Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leaders have made completely baseless and defamatory allegations against the Finance Minister regarding alleged financial irregularities in the Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA).
Besides Kejriwal, Jaitley has filed the complaint against
AAP leaders -- Kumar Vishwas, Ashutosh, Sanjay Singh, Raghav Chadha and Deepak Bajpai -- for their alleged defamatory remarks.
Luthra told the court that they have made defamatory statements against Jaitley not only in a press conference but also on their Twitter accounts.
The complaint has been filed for the alleged offences under sections 499 (defamation), 500 (punishment for defamation), 501 (printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory), 502 (sale of printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter), 34 (common intention) and 35 (when such an act is criminal by reason of its being done with a criminal knowledge or intention) of the IPC.
"Neither Jaitley nor any of his family members have any connections with 21st Century Media Pvt Ltd. Records of Registrar of Companies can be summoned to see that Jaitley has no connection whatsoever with this firm," he said.
Luthra argued that these leaders had deliberately and with a malafide design made false allegations regarding Jaitley to create an impression that money has been siphoned.
These defamatory statements have damaged the reputation of Jaitley and have caused irreversible damage to him, the lawyer said.
To this, the magistrate asked, "Have you placed any records of DDCA ?"
Responding to the court's query, Luthra said, "No. I (Jaitley) am not the office bearer of DDCA since 2013. We can summon the necessary records."
At the fag end of the hearing, the senior counsel requested the court if Jaitley's statement could be recorded today itself.
The court, however, said it would not be possible today and fixed the matter for recording complainant evidence on January 5, next year.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
