A joint plea was today moved by Union Minister Arun Jaitley and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal to "settle" their over two year old litigation regarding alleged defamatory statements made against the BJP leader after the AAP supremo apologised for his remarks.
The move by Kejriwal comes as no surprise as he has already apologised to several others, who had filed defamation suits and complaints against him.
The joint application was mentioned before Justice Manmohan by advocates Manik Dogra and Anupam Srivastava, who appeared for Jaitley and Kejriwal, respectively.
The court agreed to list the matter for hearing before the appropriate bench tomorrow if no technical objection is raised by the registry.
Jaitley had in December 2015 filed a Rs 10 crore defamation suit against Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders-- Raghav Chadha, Kumar Vishwas, Sanjay Singh, Ashutosh and Deepak Bajpai.
They had alleged financial irregularities in the Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) when Jaitley was its president. The BJP leader had denied all these allegations.
He had also filed a separate Rs 10 crore defamation case against Kejriwal after his then lawyer, Ram Jethmalani, had used objectionable words against Jaitley during his cross-examination in the first suit.
According to the joint application, apart from Kejriwal, other AAP leaders -- Chadha, Singh, Ashutosh and Bajpai -- have "unequivocally" apologised for their statements against Jaitley in connection with irregularities in DDCA.
Vishwas has not yet tendered an apology and therefore, the proceedings shall continue against him.
Kejriwal also apologised for Jethmalani's use of objectionable words against Jaitley during his cross-examination.
On February 20, Kejriwal had concluded his cross-examination of Jaitley in the first defamation suit.
The proceedings in the cross-examination was termed by the high court as "malicious" and "a sheer mockery".
The cross examination of Jaitley by Kejriwal, which had begun in March 2017, ended on February 20 after more than 300 questions were put to the union minister over around 11 days.
The proceedings had also witnessed the high court raising serious objections against the manner in which questions were being put to the BJP leader.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
