Jaya can't be made to explain benami properties of others,

Image
Press Trust of India Bengaluru
Last Updated : Jan 12 2015 | 8:25 PM IST
Former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa could not be made to explain the benami assets allegedly acquired by her aide Sasikala and her relatives Illavarasi and Sudhakaran in the disproportionate assets case, her counsel told the Karnataka High Court today.
"In the charge sheet, Sasikala, Illavarasi and Sudhakaran have been mentioned as benamigars (benami holders) and hence, A-1 - Jayalalithaa - has no obligation to explain the acquirement of such properties. Those cannot be her properties," L Nageswara Rao said.
The submissions were made before Justice C R Kumaraswamy who is hearing appeals filed by Jayalalithaa and three others challenging their conviction in the case.
Jayalalithaa and three others were convicted under Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 which defines the offence of criminal misconduct by a public servant.
The special bench, set up at the direction of the Supreme Court on December 18 to decide Jayalalithaa's plea in three months, is holding day-to-day hearing.
He also argued that the three others should not be tried under Prevention of Corruption Act as they were not public servants and hence they should be tried under Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988.
Rao argued that Jayalalithaa cannot be made to explain the benami assets acquired by Sasikala, Ilavarasi and Sudhakaran, also the estranged foster son of the AIADMK chief, as the law treats them as owners and hence their properties cannot be hers.
He contended that the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 was enacted before Prevention of Coruption Act, 1988.
A Supreme Court bench, headed by Chief Justice H L Dattu, had ordered that the hearing in the High Court on the appeal, filed by Jayalalithaa challenging her conviction and sentence in the case, be conducted on a day-to-day basis.
On October 17 last, the apex court had granted conditional bail to Jayalalithaa who was sent to jail by a trial court on September 27, saying that hearing on her appeal against conviction in the High Court should be completed in three months from December 18.
The trial court had held Jayalalithaa and three others guilty of corruption and awarded four years jail term and also slapped a fine of Rs 100 crore on her and Rs 10 crore each on three others.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 12 2015 | 8:25 PM IST

Next Story