Judicial appointment: After SC rap to Centre, Cong attacks

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 28 2016 | 7:49 PM IST
On a day the Supreme Court said the government cannot bring the judiciary to a "grinding halt" by not appointing High Court judges, Congress today expressed concern over the apex court's "cry of agony" and accused the Centre of attempting to "demean" the judiciary.
Party spokesman Abhishek Singhvi also said the government is using the Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) as an "instrument of blackmail".
"The state of affairs is shocking. Overwhelming majority of our High Courts have 50 per cent of sanctioned strength... We have again heard a cry of agony from the judiciary as an Institution," party spokesman Abhishek Singhvi told reporters.
Singhvi, himself a senior lawyer, charged the government with attempting to "demean, control...Or embarrass the judiciary".
"It is sad that Memorandum of Procedure is being used by the government as an instrument of blackmail," he said accusing the Prime Minister's Office of acting as "File Hold Ministry" in Judicial appointments.
Condemning the government over the attempt to "erode and undermine another pillar of our democracy", he said "You (the Modi dispensation) can't have a SC judgement undermined and obstructed by bargaining in this manner on the MoP."
Noting that India has a famed judiciary, one that is well respected around the world, he wanted the government to realise that its claim of good governance would come to a nought if there are arrears of three crore cases.
"We know this government's track record in showing its intolerance for dissent. Eroding one pillar, free speech and even press freedom. We have seen its attack on Institutions. We have seen its scant regard on secularism," he said.
He said the NJAC judgment from SC should have led to quietus. "Suggesting appointments will not be cleared on time, unless Judiciary agrees to the government's MoP...This is unheard of."
Expressing deep anguish over the delay in appointment of judges in high court, the Supreme Court earlier in the day told the Centre, "You cannot bring the entire institution (of judiciary) to a grinding halt. If there is a problem with the name of a person, please send it back and ask us to reconsider.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Oct 28 2016 | 7:49 PM IST

Next Story