When contacted in Delhi, CJI said, "I am not aware of the development," and added, "No CJI can interfere in the affairs of the collegium".
In his additional written suggestions filed in the High Court on the PIL by a senior lawyer seeking withdrawal of the list of probables, Justice Karnan said certain issues have been raised in the petition.
Justice Karnan also referred to the Bar having raised questions on whether there was corruption in the selection of the prospective judges.
Justice Karnan, who created a flutter by walking into the court on January 9 during the hearing of the PIL, has drawn flak from the apex court for his action.
A division bench of the High Court comprising Justice V.Dhanapalan and Justice K K Sasidharan today adjourned the hearing of the petition filed by senior advocate R.Gandhi seeking withdrawal of the list recommended and sent by the court's Collegium.
The Supreme Court had stayed the Madras High Court order to maintain status quo on the process of appointing 12 judges, saying it is a "serious matter" which will be taken up by itself.
In a related development, two more advocates P.Rathinam and S.Duraisamy filed separate petitions with a prayer to recall the list, which were adjourned by the bench by four weeks.
Meanwhile, members of the Madras High Court Advocates Association (MHAA) today boycotted the court on the issue and raised slogans in the court halls.
