"I would not want to conclude on it... I have heard a lot from people both about short and long term problems, definitely there are lot of lessons to learn," Nirmala Sitharaman told reporters here when asked if the state government has failed in disaster management.
Tamil Nadu has witnessed heavy rains in the past ten days and consequential flooding in several regions killing over 100 in related incidents.
Sharing the feedback from affected people, she said there were several grievances like sections of residents not being informed beforehand about the possibility of flooding.
Also, there was mix up of sewage with rain water and it has inundated some houses in Velachery. Expressing concern, she said all efforts must be made to preempt the possibility of an epidemic outbreak.
Tamil Nadu Chief Secretary had informed the Union Home Secretary that they were managing the situation and that the Centre will be apprised over requirements.
Stating that usually an assessment by the Centre happened after the State's request, she said such an official inspection by the Centre could happen anytime based on Tamil Nadu's request.
She said Union Minister Venkiah Naidu has done an aerial inspection of flood ravaged parts of Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu.
Asked if the disaster management planning was not proper,
Radhakrishnan said, "sure", and underscored the importance of preventive steps by quoting a Tamil proverb.
"If such things (flooding, loss of lives) happen even after disasters like Thane cyclone and Tsunami, it shows that the administration has been very negligent," he said and referred to loss of lives in Cuddalore district and submergence of agriculture fields.
Citing a specific instance where five people were allowed to reside in a damaged house in Cuddalore district, he said, "a more negligent thing cannot happen anywhere else".
He said rather, the cash could be deposited in the bank accounts of beneficiaries and as for those unaffected such aid may be provided for "preventive measures".
"I don't want to politicise it, but, why it is given and what is the aim.? We are being led (by the circumstances) to have a political view, we do not know why it is given and how beneficiaries are utilising it.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
