Little India riot case: Accused lying, says prosecution

Image
Press Trust of India Singapore
Last Updated : Apr 30 2015 | 9:07 AM IST
The prosecution in the Little India Riot case has charged the accused Indian national of lying about being blocked by police from getting into his rented room in Little India, the area where the riot occurred in December 8, 2013.
Arun Kaliamurthy, 29, took the stand yesterday on the third day of his trial for failing to disperse on the night of the riot even after being lawfully commanded to do so by the police, reported The Straits Times.
Arun told the court he did try to "disperse" when told to do so by police trying to clear the vicinity of Race Course Road, the area of Singapore's worst street violence in which 23 emergency vehicles were damaged or set on fire and 43 enforcement officers injured.
Arun claimed as he approached his block in Chander Road, auxiliary police officers prevented him from heading up, leaving him "no choice" but to hang around at restaurants nearby.
Arun was later arrested at a restaurant along Kampong Kapor Road at about 2 am on December 9, hours after the riot.
However, Deputy Public Prosecutor Sellakumaran Sellamuthoo accused Arun of lying, pointing out that his flat mate had in fact made it home earlier and had not mentioned any difficulties with auxiliary police officers.
Before his arrest, Arun also took a five-minute video with his mobile phone showing burning vehicles and men cheering, whistling, even urging others to take part in the mayhem.
Arun said he was so focused on taking the video that he could not fully register the commands to disperse.
He also claimed that he assumed the instructions were for those actively involved in the riot.
Arun said he did not think it applied to bystanders, describing himself as one.
But DPP Sellakumaran said that the commands to disperse could be heard clearly in Arun's video, and that the accused had blatantly ignored them.
Arun disagreed, telling the court that he would "certainly" have left the area if he had understood that the announcements were meant for everyone.
District Judge Shaiffudin Saruwan is expected to deliver his verdict on May 28 and if convicted, Arun could face up to two years in jail and a fine.
Arun, who was then in Singapore looking for a job, is one of the 25 Indian nationals charged for the riot.
All the others have been convicted and sentenced to jail, some with caning.
The riot broke out amidst a crowd of some 400 South Asian migrant workers when an Indian national died in an accident with a bus.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 30 2015 | 9:07 AM IST

Next Story