Madras HC allows railways to clear encroachments in 3.9 acres for MRTS

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : May 04 2018 | 10:10 PM IST

The Madras High Court has given the green signal to Southern Railways to take possession of a 3.9-acre property worth more than Rs 100 crore in Velacherry for the Mass Rapid Transit System.

In an interim order recently, the court permitted the railways to remove encroachments, including a fish market, which was constructed on 20 cents.

Ninety seven people under the banner of Annai Indira Gandhi Hut Dwellers Welfare Association had challenged a single judge order.

On March 21, Justice S Vaidyanathan had addressed the 97 people not as encroachers but land-grabbers and directed the government to remove encroachments on 4.8 acres and hand over the property to the southern railways to be used for the MRTS.

Railway authorities made repeated attempts for removing the encroachments with the help of revenue authorities but in vain.

Meanwhile, the association challenged the single judge order.

When the appeal came up, counsel for the railways disputed the ownership claim of the 97 people.

The counsel submitted that as an interim arrangement, the railways may be permitted to remove encroachments in 3.9 acres, excluding 97 cents occupied by the association, but including the fish market.

As the association said they did not have any grievance in the railways removing encroachments in the remaining 3.9 acres, a division bench of Justices R Subbaiah and PD Audikesavalu passed the interim order permitting the railway to go ahead with the removal of encroachments.

The matter dates back to 1992.

With the Southern Railway requisitioning the land for the MRTS project, the government had, on December 29, 2003, passed an order, cancelling a 1992 government order for allotment of one cent each to the 97 people and allotted the property to the railways.

Aggrieved by the order, they had challenged it in the high court. On June 30, 2004, the court had passed an interim order, staying the eviction of the encroachers.

In 2017, the case was taken up for hearing by Justice Vaidyanathan, who ordered inspection of the entire property by a team led by the collector.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 04 2018 | 10:10 PM IST

Next Story