Justice S Vimala made the observation while dismissing recently a plea by Salem branch of the Oriental Insurance Company, challenging a Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal's order to the insurance company to pay Rs 1,00,000 as compensation to the relatives of Salem resident Dhamodaran, 30, who died in a road accident in October 2008.
The tribunal, however, had also ruled that the father was not entitled to receive the relief amount on the ground of his name not being there in the victim's legal heir certificate.
Referring to the Indian Succession Act and intestate succession (succession without will) which is governed by the Hindu Succession Act, the judge said, "This intestate succession has nothing to do with the entitlement to compensation, when a claim is made in respect of death arising out of the accident... The principle of compensation is based on reparation, what is lost is sought to be compensated so far as money can."
After their son's death, Damodaran's parents had moved the Salem MACT, seeking a compensation of Rs 7,00,000, against which the tribunal awarded merely Rs 1,00,000.
The insurance company had come to the high court against the tribunal's order to pay the compensation.
On such deposit being made, both the father and the mother of the deceased are permitted to withdraw the amount, he added.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
