The conventional finger test of sexual assault victims is "a degrading procedure, crude medically and scientifically irrelevant", the manual says, stating that it should not be followed, as the information about the past sexual conduct has been considered irrelevant by the courts in several cases.
Further, the doctor should not identify the victim as habituated to sexual intercourse or otherwise, it says.
The manual was published today.
Absence of injuries on the body and private parts does not rule out the commission of the offence, as injuries are not always a determining factor, according to the manual.
While eliciting the information or 'history', no third person, including the police, should be present, it adds.
According to the government resolution which published this manual, the purpose was to help the investigation of sexual assaults and administration of justice.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
